As Dante reaches
the depth of Hell he is less sympathetic to the damned, and he often
writes slapstick comedy. He talks to the butts of the simoniac Popes,
who are buried upside-down, and he has a devil salute his platoon
with a trumpet sound coming from his “arse.”
But in Canto XX
Dante cries, in pity for the diviners. He is scolded by Virgil, as
usual, but we should not mistake Virgil for the higher conscience in
Dante. Virgil, even as a venerable guide, is still a Pagan in Hell –
he is not always right.
In fact, in this
strange canto Virgil declares that what he wrote in the Aeneid on the
origins of his city, Mantua, is plain wrong. This apparently is a
device to distance Virgil from the accuse of divination. Virgil's
book, according to Esolen, was used in the Middle Ages as a means to
foresee the future, by opening it at random and reading a passage.
This reminds me of the I-Ching, the Book of Changes used for
divination in Chinese culture.
I used to read the
Tarot cards (which are of Italian origin, and were condemned by the
Pope) and I have consulted the I-Ching, even though I use them mostly
for meditation and cultural interest; as a method of divination they
often fail.
I, like Dante, was
horrified at the punishment for the diviners: they have their head
turned backward, which is an indignity, and they can only see behind
them. Why was their sin so terrible, and...wasn't Dante also
predicting the future, when he places Boniface VIII, then alive, in
Hell?
Well, as to
predicting the future, Dante makes it clear in canto XX that he is
writing a book, precisely a comedy, and precisely...canto XX (the
pedantic attention to detail, like Virgil's long geography lesson, is
a typical tool of comedy).
Dante never declared anywhere that he is
the voice of God. In Purgatory he invokes the Muses, not the Holy
Spirit, to assist him (in Hell he does not invoke anyone). He does
say in this canto that everything he writes is the truth. And in a
way it is. The people he encounters, and the ethical questions they
provoke, are real, in the same sense that Hamlet is real.
Dante even assures
us in Canto I that he has gone through Hell for real, with his living
body. But let's examine the implications of what he is saying. In
Dante's times visionaries recounted their dreams of Hell, claiming
they were inspired directly by God, and Medieval people believed
them. But if someone insists he has been to Hell, and to the planets
above, “in person,” would anyone believe him? Of course not. This
is Dante's way of saying, again, that he is writing a great adventure
where the readers are invited to suspend disbelief ...but it is still
a story.
As to the gravity
of the diviners' sin, Esolen thinks it has to do with fraud: the
claim they could tell the future, which is not possible. I agree that
predicting the future is not possible...I have plenty of
disappointing evidence from my Tarot. But we should not overlook that
in literature, and in the examples in Dante's Hell, the diviners are
successful in predicting the future.
Or, if their sin consists of
“wanting” to know the future, which only God should know, why are
the biblical prophets revered, and why does not Virgil rebuke the
damned and Dante when they discuss the future?
Dante does not say
why the diviners are singled out. He mostly makes fun of them. Even
the venerable Tiresias is remembered not for his role in the Theban
tragedies, but for meddling with snakes and getting punished.
If we are not given
a clear-cut answer (and in a masterpiece we never are, unless it is
on the geography of Mantua), we are free to propose an interpretation
as long as it does not contradict the text. According to a modern
current of criticism, “all reading is misreading” anyway.
“Tragic irony”
for the Greeks meant that in trying to avoid one's fate, the
protagonists end up causing it to happen. If Oedipus had not been
left to die by his royal parents to avoid the prophecy that he would
kill his father and marry his mother, Oedipus would have known who
his father was, and would have taken precautions to avoid killing
him. Instead, he leaves his alleged father to protect him from the
prophecy, and during a petty skirmish along the road he kills his
real father.
In the same
tradition is Shakespeare's Macbeth, who is told he will be defeated
only when the forest will move. Confident of his victory, he murders
his lord and takes his place, and alienates all his friends,
suspecting them as traitors, until they rebel. They cut brushes from
the forest and advance with them as shields. The forest is moving,
and Macbeth is defeated.
Even Melville
follows this tradition. Captain Ahab is told that he can be killed by
Moby Dick only when he sees on the sea a hearse made of American
wood. Ahab pushed his ship and crew to their destruction, only
realizing at the end that his sinking ship is the hearse.
What these stories
have in common is that decent people decided to cheat. They employed
dirty means, treason, murder, usurpation, to reach the predicted
fortunate outcome or to avoid a foretold unfavorable one.
Dante does not
behave this way. When Brunetto Latini predicts to him good fortune
because he is a good citizen and a good man, Dante responds, “I
will do what is right, no matter how Fortuna turns.”
We can't
control all our events and circumstances. We can only follow our
conscience. Buddhism has the same concept, warning us not to be
swayed by the eight winds: prosperity and decline, fame and censure,
and so on. One has to practice right speech, right thought, right
action, right compassion, no matter what the circumstances are. Dante
would have been a good Buddhist.
People can do the
right thing and end up in Hell. Farinata had stood up against his own
allies, who wanted to raze Florence to the ground. After his death
the Florentines declared him a heretic, and his corpse was exhumed
and thrown on unconsecrated ground. That was the repayment for saving
the city. And then God upholds the sentence and puts him in Hell. But
there Farinata stands straight, because his conscience is clear. Who
says that Dante's comedy does not have heroes?






No comments:
Post a Comment